
ESL Challenger Season 49 Asia-Pacific: Day 3 Recap
The action continued at the ESL Challenger League Season 49 - Asia-Pacific with 14 BO1s taking place as the teams were looking to get off to a good start early on in the event.
Here's a quick look at the third day's results from the ESL Challenger League Season 49 Asia-Pacific.
Here's a look at the results from today's games.

-72c 1 - 1 UR
The games for the day kicked off with -72C facing UR on Ancient in the opening BO1. A strong showing from the Chinese team saw them convert a 10-2 half to a 13-3 win. The second BO1 headed to Mirage, where it was -72C's turn to wreak havoc, as the recorded an 8-4 T-half to ultimately secure a 13-6 win.




![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
10 - 13 | -3 | 79.7 | 68.8% | 0.91 |
![]() |
11 - 15 | -4 | 61.3 | 68.8% | 0.78 |
![]() |
8 - 13 | -5 | 66.9 | 62.5% | 0.71 |
![]() |
6 - 15 | -9 | 55.9 | 56.2% | 0.57 |
![]() |
7 - 13 | -6 | 43.9 | 43.8% | 0.51 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
20 - 6 | +14 | 107.5 | 93.8% | 2.04 |
![]() |
14 - 9 | +5 | 91.2 | 93.8% | 1.42 |
![]() |
14 - 8 | +6 | 89.1 | 68.8% | 1.40 |
![]() |
12 - 10 | +2 | 99.9 | 93.8% | 1.29 |
![]() |
9 - 9 | +0 | 62.6 | 93.8% | 1.15 |










![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
15 - 13 | +2 | 107.9 | 63.2% | 1.29 |
![]() |
15 - 12 | +3 | 74.3 | 63.2% | 1.05 |
![]() |
10 - 13 | -3 | 54.2 | 57.9% | 0.73 |
![]() |
8 - 14 | -6 | 52.1 | 63.2% | 0.68 |
![]() |
6 - 16 | -10 | 36.5 | 57.9% | 0.55 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
16 - 9 | +7 | 84.2 | 73.7% | 1.51 |
![]() |
16 - 13 | +3 | 108.8 | 57.9% | 1.34 |
![]() |
11 - 8 | +3 | 69.2 | 68.4% | 1.21 |
![]() |
14 - 12 | +2 | 72.8 | 84.2% | 1.17 |
![]() |
11 - 12 | -1 | 49.9 | 78.9% | 0.94 |







The QUBE 0-2 Just Swing
The other Mongolian team The Qube took on Chinese team Just Swing which started off with a tight contest on Inferno. After a tied game in regulation, Just Swing went flawless in Overtime to secure a 16-12 win. The second Bo1 Ancient, was all Just Swing, as the managed to secure 8 rounds on the T-side to seal the deal with a 13-5 win.




![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
24 - 18 | +6 | 94.1 | 71.4% | 1.30 |
![]() |
21 - 20 | +1 | 85.2 | 71.4% | 1.06 |
![]() |
15 - 17 | -2 | 58.9 | 64.3% | 0.84 |
![]() |
14 - 20 | -6 | 52.4 | 60.7% | 0.80 |
![]() |
14 - 23 | -9 | 66.1 | 60.7% | 0.73 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
23 - 17 | +6 | 95.0 | 75.0% | 1.41 |
![]() |
25 - 17 | +8 | 88.6 | 71.4% | 1.39 |
![]() |
18 - 21 | -3 | 77.6 | 71.4% | 1.12 |
![]() |
20 - 20 | +0 | 77.5 | 75.0% | 1.11 |
![]() |
11 - 17 | -6 | 45.0 | 75.0% | 0.84 |










![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
17 - 9 | +8 | 83.6 | 83.3% | 1.46 |
![]() |
16 - 13 | +3 | 96.6 | 72.2% | 1.42 |
![]() |
15 - 10 | +5 | 91.1 | 72.2% | 1.37 |
![]() |
10 - 6 | +4 | 80.3 | 88.9% | 1.33 |
![]() |
13 - 8 | +5 | 68.6 | 88.9% | 1.30 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
13 - 15 | -2 | 84.8 | 55.6% | 0.93 |
![]() |
11 - 12 | -1 | 58.0 | 72.2% | 0.85 |
![]() |
8 - 15 | -7 | 69.1 | 55.6% | 0.70 |
![]() |
9 - 15 | -6 | 55.5 | 55.6% | 0.54 |
![]() |
4 - 14 | -10 | 33.7 | 55.6% | 0.39 |







FengDa 1 - 1 THE
FengDa's matchup with THE saw two stark contrasts as both teams replicated each other's scores. The first Bo1 saw FengDa convert a 10-2 T-half on Ancient to notch a 13-11 win, while THE gave them a taste of their own medicine by getting past the second Bo1 on Mirage with a 13-11 win.






![]() ![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
19 - 16 | +3 | 80.5 | 70.8% | 1.16 |
![]() |
18 - 18 | +0 | 80.3 | 66.7% | 1.07 |
![]() |
15 - 17 | -2 | 78.1 | 62.5% | 1.00 |
![]() |
13 - 18 | -5 | 63.3 | 58.3% | 0.82 |
![]() |
7 - 22 | -15 | 51.5 | 45.8% | 0.48 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
25 - 12 | +13 | 105.5 | 83.3% | 1.60 |
![]() |
18 - 15 | +3 | 88.0 | 70.8% | 1.24 |
![]() |
19 - 13 | +6 | 70.5 | 70.8% | 1.15 |
![]() |
16 - 16 | +0 | 77.2 | 66.7% | 1.11 |
![]() |
12 - 17 | -5 | 71.0 | 79.2% | 0.91 |













![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
20 - 17 | +3 | 91.6 | 79.2% | 1.25 |
![]() |
22 - 18 | +4 | 99.0 | 62.5% | 1.23 |
![]() |
17 - 18 | -1 | 74.1 | 70.8% | 1.09 |
![]() |
13 - 20 | -7 | 64.4 | 66.7% | 0.87 |
![]() |
13 - 18 | -5 | 52.5 | 62.5% | 0.75 |
![]() ![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
31 - 14 | +17 | 124.0 | 83.3% | 2.03 |
![]() |
18 - 15 | +3 | 85.1 | 70.8% | 1.18 |
![]() |
20 - 21 | -1 | 74.2 | 70.8% | 1.02 |
![]() |
11 - 18 | -7 | 55.2 | 66.7% | 0.83 |
![]() |
10 - 17 | -7 | 60.6 | 66.7% | 0.80 |












TYLOO 2 -0 NomadS
TYLOO managed to ease past NomadS convincingly in both the Bo1s today. A flawless T-side after an 8-4 lead on the CT side helped them secure Mirage. It was followed by a demonic run on the T-side of Anubis where they converted a 10-2 half to a 13-7 win.


![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
17 - 14 | +3 | 86.8 | 60.0% | 1.14 |
![]() |
16 - 16 | +0 | 74.3 | 80.0% | 0.98 |
![]() |
8 - 16 | -8 | 73.5 | 65.0% | 0.76 |
![]() |
10 - 17 | -7 | 69.1 | 80.0% | 0.74 |
![]() |
10 - 16 | -6 | 33.9 | 80.0% | 0.66 |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
22 - 11 | +11 | 106.7 | 95.0% | 1.93 |
![]() |
19 - 15 | +4 | 108.7 | 80.0% | 1.48 |
![]() |
15 - 11 | +4 | 85.5 | 80.0% | 1.38 |
![]() |
13 - 11 | +2 | 61.8 | 75.0% | 1.08 |
![]() |
10 - 13 | -3 | 51.2 | 80.0% | 0.87 |



K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
17 - 5 | +12 | 90.9 | 88.2% | 1.69 |
![]() |
17 - 10 | +7 | 104.9 | 82.4% | 1.52 |
![]() |
13 - 7 | +6 | 80.8 | 88.2% | 1.44 |
![]() |
12 - 12 | +0 | 77.5 | 76.5% | 1.20 |
![]() |
12 - 11 | +1 | 81.8 | 76.5% | 1.18 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
15 - 13 | +2 | 95.7 | 70.6% | 1.31 |
![]() |
9 - 13 | -4 | 60.6 | 52.9% | 0.75 |
![]() |
8 - 16 | -8 | 71.5 | 58.8% | 0.67 |
![]() |
7 - 15 | -8 | 45.5 | 52.9% | 0.64 |
![]() |
6 - 14 | -8 | 43.9 | 58.8% | 0.54 |


Chinggis Warriors 2-0 LFO 2
Chinggis Warriors outlasted LFO 2 in the two rounds of Bo1s today. First, they surged to a 8-4 lead on their CT side of Anubis to cruise their way to a 13-8 win. Then despite trailing behind 5-7, they woke up on the T-side of Ancient to seal the deal with a 13-10 win.


![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
22 - 16 | +6 | 116.0 | 69.6% | 1.50 |
![]() |
13 - 17 | -4 | 74.8 | 82.6% | 1.10 |
![]() |
18 - 14 | +4 | 64.1 | 69.6% | 1.05 |
![]() |
15 - 17 | -2 | 68.0 | 73.9% | 1.02 |
![]() |
13 - 19 | -6 | 71.3 | 69.6% | 0.83 |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
24 - 14 | +10 | 107.4 | 82.6% | 1.64 |
![]() |
19 - 16 | +3 | 82.3 | 82.6% | 1.23 |
![]() |
16 - 15 | +1 | 71.7 | 73.9% | 1.08 |
![]() |
12 - 19 | -7 | 71.9 | 60.9% | 0.85 |
![]() |
11 - 17 | -6 | 58.0 | 60.9% | 0.72 |




K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
17 - 15 | +2 | 92.9 | 76.2% | 1.28 |
![]() |
18 - 15 | +3 | 90.6 | 76.2% | 1.23 |
![]() |
19 - 17 | +2 | 83.0 | 71.4% | 1.10 |
![]() |
11 - 19 | -8 | 70.0 | 61.9% | 0.80 |
![]() |
8 - 16 | -8 | 52.9 | 66.7% | 0.67 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
26 - 12 | +14 | 122.0 | 81.0% | 2.00 |
![]() |
21 - 16 | +5 | 109.1 | 76.2% | 1.40 |
![]() |
12 - 13 | -1 | 73.0 | 66.7% | 0.99 |
![]() |
13 - 15 | -2 | 66.8 | 76.2% | 0.95 |
![]() |
10 - 17 | -7 | 54.0 | 66.7% | 0.78 |






The Huns 2 - 0 harizma
The HUNS went up against harizma and managed to secure two convincing wins for themselves. The first Anubis saw an impenetrable defense from them, propelling them to a 13-4 win. The second map saw a relentless T-side as they closed the map with another win, this time by a 13-7 margin.


![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
21 - 10 | +11 | 114.9 | 88.2% | 1.89 |
![]() |
19 - 8 | +11 | 95.1 | 82.4% | 1.79 |
![]() |
11 - 9 | +2 | 96.1 | 82.4% | 1.44 |
![]() |
13 - 10 | +3 | 93.6 | 82.4% | 1.29 |
![]() |
13 - 8 | +5 | 61.3 | 82.4% | 1.18 |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
10 - 15 | -5 | 85.0 | 58.8% | 0.81 |
![]() |
9 - 15 | -6 | 56.4 | 52.9% | 0.67 |
![]() |
9 - 15 | -6 | 64.8 | 52.9% | 0.63 |
![]() |
8 - 16 | -8 | 48.4 | 47.1% | 0.62 |
![]() |
8 - 16 | -8 | 53.0 | 64.7% | 0.57 |







K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
16 - 15 | +1 | 86.0 | 80.0% | 1.22 |
![]() |
14 - 15 | -1 | 77.9 | 55.0% | 1.04 |
![]() |
11 - 14 | -3 | 64.4 | 75.0% | 0.77 |
![]() |
6 - 12 | -6 | 48.0 | 65.0% | 0.61 |
![]() |
7 - 17 | -10 | 39.0 | 45.0% | 0.50 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
17 - 9 | +8 | 86.2 | 85.0% | 1.51 |
![]() |
14 - 15 | -1 | 99.8 | 80.0% | 1.21 |
![]() |
13 - 10 | +3 | 77.5 | 65.0% | 1.17 |
![]() |
14 - 10 | +4 | 64.7 | 85.0% | 1.13 |
![]() |
15 - 12 | +3 | 64.9 | 80.0% | 1.12 |






Lynn Vision 2 - 0 LFO 2
Lynn Vision, in the server with CALLM3SU3 and suki, faced LFO 2. Anubis saw Lynn Vision's 9-3 T side push them to a big 13-5 win before having to fight off LFO 2 on Ancient in the second BO1, picking up a 13-10 win to lock in another 2-0 for themselves.


![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
16 - 8 | +8 | 94.7 | 83.3% | 1.52 |
![]() |
13 - 9 | +4 | 75.9 | 66.7% | 1.35 |
![]() |
12 - 9 | +3 | 63.0 | 72.2% | 1.17 |
![]() |
12 - 12 | +0 | 83.1 | 61.1% | 1.17 |
![]() |
13 - 12 | +1 | 76.3 | 66.7% | 1.09 |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
20 - 11 | +9 | 95.1 | 66.7% | 1.35 |
![]() |
10 - 13 | -3 | 80.1 | 50.0% | 0.86 |
![]() |
10 - 14 | -4 | 63.6 | 61.1% | 0.68 |
![]() |
8 - 12 | -4 | 56.6 | 55.6% | 0.64 |
![]() |
2 - 16 | -14 | 50.4 | 44.4% | 0.37 |






K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
20 - 18 | +2 | 92.7 | 69.6% | 1.16 |
![]() |
16 - 16 | +0 | 79.8 | 60.9% | 1.05 |
![]() |
17 - 16 | +1 | 81.2 | 65.2% | 1.01 |
![]() |
16 - 18 | -2 | 65.9 | 65.2% | 0.88 |
![]() |
7 - 18 | -11 | 58.5 | 65.2% | 0.61 |
![]() |
K - D | +/- | ADR | KAST | Rating 2.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
18 - 16 | +2 | 91.9 | 87.0% | 1.35 |
![]() |
19 - 15 | +4 | 88.9 | 73.9% | 1.35 |
![]() |
19 - 15 | +4 | 85.8 | 78.3% | 1.25 |
![]() |
15 - 15 | +0 | 71.8 | 69.6% | 1.03 |
![]() |
15 - 15 | +0 | 63.8 | 73.9% | 0.96 |




